Mumbai-resident Nandgopal Radhakrishnan had three sons, Nikhil, Anay and Vivek and a daughter, Manjula. Since his best friend Ashok Kumar was childless, he decided to give his eldest son Nikhil in adoption. In the course of time, Radhakrishnan’s two sons passed away and he married off his daughter.
When it was time for Radhakrishnan to give his moveable and immoveable assets to his only daughter, Nikhil threw spanner in the works to claim his share. He filed a partition suit but lost the case. MakaaniQ tells you why Nikhil’s contention didn’t hold much water.
According to Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956, after adoption, the adopted son/daughter lose all the rights of a son/daughter in their biological family, including the right to claim any share in the estate of the biological father or relations, or any stake in the coparcenary property. The only exception where an adopted child is not entitled to the full rights of a biological child in the adoptive family were if he/she was adopted by a disqualified heir.
The child is entitled to inherit from his adoptive father and other lineal descendants, like a biological heir. At the same time, the adoptive father and his relations too are entitled to inherit from the adopted boy. A child can only be adopted if he/she is Hindu, not previously adopted, unmarried and has not turned fifteen yet.
The property rights of an adopted son/daughter are limited only to inherit the property of his/her adoptive parents. But, at the same time, if the natural parents want to give their property to their natural child, they may do it by way of gift or will.
Thus, it can be inferred that for all intents and purposes, the adopted child is treated like a biological child into the family into which he/she has been adopted and is considered the descendant of the family.